English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

End-of-life (EOL) decisions are often complex and difficult. These decisions may change the focus of intervention from aggressive life-sustaining treatment to measures designed to relieve symptoms and provide comfort. So it is necessary for health care providers to concern with providing care that facilitates the patient’s well-being. In Korea, EOL decisions are made frequently and practically in a clinical setting and involve ethical and legal issues. Do-NotResuscitate (DNR) is the most popular type of EOL decision.1) Most health care providers stated they have made DNR decisions in their practice.2-4) Since the landmark case called “Case of the Boramae Hospital”5) has brought EOL issues to light in Korea, a proposal has been made to build up a social consensus and guidelines for EOL decision making in Korea. Although EOL decisions habitually have to be made in clinical settings, before the

한국의 심폐소생술 금지(Do-Not-Resuscitate, DNR) 대한 통합적 고찰