English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article carries has the objective of evidencing the effects of the stabilization of provisional guardianship of anticipated urgency granted in an antecedent character, and to substantiate the possible injury to the principles of the adversary and ample defense resulting from the way in which the New Code of Civil Procedure was updated. Because the analysis of the current principles, in a comparative analysis to the jurisprudential and doctrinal understandings reflected by the hermeneutic interpretation, there is a rupture with the speed postulated by the reform, since, in the current way, the present institute is applied in a way that procedural harnessing effects are not used in their entirety, while immobilizing and institutionalizing erroneous interpretations that can be exploited perniciously as legal frauds in the form of applying the stabilization and amendment of the proposal in view of the relativization of the standard of contradictory and broad defense.

revista científica semana acadêmica

ESTABILIZAÇÃO DA TUTELA PROVISÓRIA DE URGÊNCIA ANTECIPADA CONCEDIDA EM CARÁTER ANTECEDENTE: A POSSÍVEL LESÃO AOS PRINCÍPIOS DO CONTRADITÓRIO E AMPLA DEFESA