English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the possibility of using illicit evidence in criminal proceedings through the relativization of the constitutional seal under the principle of proportionality. We will also analyze the problem represented by the evidence derived from other illicit evidence. Also, the positioning of jurisprudence and doctrine will be evaluated against the theme, trying to identify the benefits and vicissitudes of the use of contaminated evidence. The results will be presented on the qualitative form, since they will give the researcher the freedom to understand the presence and the changes of the aspects that cover the theme. The research was developed from a literature review, presenting as method the interpretation of doctrines and articles involved with the subject under study.

A PROVA ILÍCITA FRENTE À RELATIVAÇÃO DA VEDAÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL: UMA ABORDAGEM ACERCA DA POSSIBILIDADE DE SUA ACEITAÇÃO NO PROCESSO PENAL