English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DNA obtained from hard tissues, such as bones and teeth, is used to identify highly decomposed or skeletonized corpses. EŠective DNA extraction is critical; the quantity and quality of DNA and the levels of co-extracted PCR inhibitors greatly in‰uence subsequent steps. We evaluated three methods used to extract DNA from bones and teeth: use of the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), the standard phenol/ chloroform-based method, and the PrepFiler Express BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientiˆc). We modiˆed the protocols of the two kits. We assessed DNA quantity and quality. The QIAamp DNA Mini Kit yielded more DNA and more informative STR proˆles than did the other methods; that kit is optimal.

A comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from bone and tooth samples