English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the article, the institution of pecuniary penalties (fie, correctional labor) in the criminal legislationof Kazakhstan is analyzed. The author identifis peculiarities of these penalties and their objectives. It isstated that, despite of the general trend to humanizing criminal law set by the Conception of law policyof the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2010–2020, the potential of the discussed penalties has not been fullyutilized. The causes are: 1) diffiulty of implementation of these sanctions by courts, and 2) imperfection ofthe Criminal Code.The author compares penalties for taking bribes and for a fraud committed by an offiial of a statebody. Despite of the similarity between these two crimes the sanctions differ very much. The fist crimeis punishable by monetary fies while the second one is sanctioned exceptionally by imprisonment. In theauthor’s opinion, such a situation contradicts the principles of justice and humanization of punishments andbreaks the hierarchical order of the system of criminal penalties.The diffiulties of execution of pecuniary penalties are discussed as well. In particular, the periods forpaying fies are too short. The author proposes some measures for improving the criminal legislation of theRepublic of Kazakhstan in this fild.

Pecuniary Penalties within the System of Criminal Penalties in the Republic of Kazakhstan