English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article deals with the problematic issues of research of the expert conclusion during the trial and proposed variants of their legislative settlement. The current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine does not regulate the issue of the procedure for investigating the expert’s opinion, in particular: it does not indicate the subject, which announces it during the court proceedings; it does not regulate the issue of volume, which must be declared; there are no means and methods to study expert conclusion.

RESEARCH OF THE EXPERT’S CONCLUSION IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE