English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  People with cancer commonly have unidentified palliative care needs. The NAT-C is a validated tool to identify and triage unmet needs.    Aim  To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a primary care cRCT of the NAT-C: 1) recruiting four GP-practices and 40–60 patients, 2) uptake of NAT-C, 3) questionnaire completion 4) acceptability of measures.    Method  A non-blinded cRCT with process evaluation. Patients with active cancer were identified through cancer registries or opportunistically. Carers were nominated by patient-participant. Participants completed measures at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients booked a 20-minute GP-assessment post-baseline. Patients, carers, and GP practice staff participated in interviews and focus groups.    Results  Five GP practices were approached, four recruited and trained in the use of the NAT-C. Practices were randomised (1:1) to provide a consultation with a known NAT-C trained clinician, or a clinician as usual. Forty-seven patients and 17 carers were recruited. Process evaluation informed refinement of study invitations. Recruitment rate showed a trial was feasible. Forty-three (94%) patients received a study appointment, 42/43 (95%) attended and 32/43 (76%) a NAT-guided consultation. The proposed primary outcome measure (Supportive Care Needs Survey) was completed by 43 (91%) at 1 month and the proportion with ≥1 moderate–severe unmet need fell from 72% (baseline) to 45%. Fifteen patient interviews and four focus groups with GP practices were conducted. Participants supported the definitive trial and found measures acceptable.    Conclusion  A definitive cRCT is feasible based on the recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and data collection.

british journal of general practice

Cluster randomised feasibility trial to test the routine use of the Needs Assessment Tool: Cancer (NAT:-C) in primary care to reduce unmet patient and carer needs and determine the feasibility of a definitive trial