English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

While considering a problematic case in a case-based discussion we found ourselves asking the question, should GPs and other frontline clinicians allow themselves to become involved in ethical judgements? Given the position that every decision has a moral aspect of some kind, is this even possible?  surmise that the conscious avoidance of ethical judgement may take place in the following ways: We were aware that publications in the clinical ethics literature suggested that conscience and compassion were problematic concepts in health care for clinicians.1,2 While these address compassion and conscience, they are possibly interpreted as clinicians ought not to make ethical judgements, or enact human values beyond those strictly stipulated by the job.Personal conscience (at least with regard to conscientious objection) has been challenged on the basis that ethical deliberation should not take place in the clinical encounter and clinicians should offer whatever the governing …

Should GPs avoid making ethical judgements?