English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The enactment of Law 9099/95 promoted important innovations in Brazilian criminal proceedings, bringing in a jurisdiction of consensus which is clearly distinct from the usual dispute resolution. The Special Criminal Courts procedure, whose creation is envisaged in the 1988 Federal Constitution itself, has brought consequences for the victims and the perpetrators of the criminal offences within its jurisdiction, notably because of the depenalising measures it contemplates. The doctrine has diverged as to the effects of Law 9099/95, and while some authors argue that it violates certain constitutional principles, others believe that it has only brought benefits to both parties in the criminal situation and to the Criminal Justice as a whole. Considering that the procedure of the Special Criminal Court is increasingly present in everyday forensics, the analysis of some main aspects of Law 9099/95, as well as of doctrinal positions on the subject, is essential for the formation of a critical and conscious judgment on the matter, and this work intends to do so.

Juizado especial criminal: a divergência doutrinária quanto aos efeitos da Lei n. 9.099/95 no processo penal brasileiro.