English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper aims to critically analyze a trial ruled by the Superior Court of Justice in 2014 (REsp n. 1.448.969/SC) in which that Court authorized the adoption by the ancestors of the adopted, despite the existence of an express legal prohibition (ECA, article 42, § 1o). The legal grounds used in the vote of the judge (Minister) are then problematized, in the light of the categories of strict legality and judicial activism, in order to verify if they are sustained on a critical examination based on criteria of integrity and coherence or if they are in factrhetorical or ad hoc arguments to justify a solipsistic decision, incompatible with the democratic state. This is, therefore, a paper about the theory of Law and not about the rights of children and adolescents.

atuação

Avós podem adotar netos? Ativismo judicial e limites da legalidade: análise crítica do julgamento do REsp 1.448.969/SC pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça