English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Helping individuals vs. fixing the system: Distinguishing facets of adolescent civic reasoning Lauren M. Alvis The current study examined associations among adolescents’ civic behaviors, sociomoral judgments, and welfareand justice-oriented reasoning. Participants included 721 adolescents (Mage = 15.87, SD = 1.28; 90% Caucasian; 55.6% female) living in a University city in a MidAtlantic state. Participants completed survey questionnaires that assessed sociomoral judgments for and involvement in civic behaviors, as well as a free-response questionnaire that assessed justifications for various forms of civic engagement. Welfare-oriented reasoning was defined as justifications that reflected a sense of obligation to address the welfare of individuals in need, whereas justice-oriented reasoning was reflected in adolescents’ use of structural justifications, which describe the potential for a behavior to implement systemic or macro-level change. Results indicated that justice-oriented reasoning, but not welfare-oriented reasoning, was associated positively with adolescent civic involvement. Additionally, justice-oriented reasoning was particularly integral to adolescent social movement behavior in that youth who viewed social movement as highly obligatory, important, and worthy of respect and used structural justifications were engaged in higher levels of social movement behavior than youth who viewed social movement as important for other reasons. The current findings provide nuanced insights into adolescents’ developing understanding of civic behaviors and highlight the importance of investigating justice-oriented reasoning as a vital component of civic development. FACETS OF ADOLESCENT CIVIC REASONING iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Aaron Metzger, my academic advisor and thesis chair for his guidance and support throughout this project. I would also like to thank Dr. Amy Gentzler and Dr. Natalie Shook for the time and helpful feedback they have provided. Lastly, my family members and friends have been an incredible source of support throughout this process. I would also like to thank my fellow lab members, Katelyn Romm and Rebecca Olson for their continued

Helping Individuals vs. Fixing the System: Distinguishing Facets of Adolescent Civic Reasoning