English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Regional flood estimation is an important issue in hydrology to anticipate and reduce the damages caused by extreme rainfall events. Approaches based on event simulation are particularly suitable to address this. As research has demonstrated the seasonality of rainfall characteristics, many flood frequency estimation approaches take into account rainfall seasonality to include seasonal fluctuations. For an event-based approach, since its hydrological model is initialized for each rainfall event, its performance is very sensitive to the initial states of the model. The seasonality of its hydrological model could thus become a decisive factor. Due to the complexity of the regionalization method, very few flood frequency estimation approaches based on event simulation have been regionalized at a large scale and do not consider the seasonality of hydrological parameters. This is the case for the SHYREG method studied in this article. Using data from HYDRO French database and SAFRAN, we discuss several adapted configurations considering the seasonality of both rainfall and hydrological parameters during its calibration and regionalization phase. Tests were carried out on 1929 catchments throughout France. Rather than calibrating a constant annual parameter for the hydrological model, we calibrated “winter” and “summer” parameters based on different observed flow quantiles (“seasonal”, “annual”, or “both”). Criteria on flood quantiles were calculated for different samplings. We also discuss the representativeness of seasonal parameters for the regionalization procedure and hydrological coherence observed from this seasonal parameterization. It seems that calibrating parameters based on seasonal flow quantiles helps reproduce annual quantiles, while the opposite is not possible. Among all the calibration configurations, calibration performed on both seasonal and annual flow quantiles makes the largest improvement compared to the initial annual parameterization method. It can correctly restitute seasonal flood quantiles for both calibration and validation catchments, with an obvious improvement in terms of estimating flood frequency in ungauged sites. It shows that the seasonality of hydrological parameters is worth considering for a regional flood estimation approach.

Taking Account of Seasonality in a Regional Flood Frequency Estimation Approach Based on Event Simulations