English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Research on selenium pollution in natural waters is continuous and discouraging. In this study, coagulation/precipitation was applied with the use of Fe(II), Fe(III), and poly-aluminum chloride (PACl) salts for Se(IV) removal at concentration range 10–100 μg Se(IV)/L that is commonly found in drinking waters. Prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-FeCl3 delivered the best uptake capacity (Q10 = 8.9 mg Se(IV)/g Fe(III) at pH 6) at the residual concentration equal to the drinking water regulation limit of 10 μg/L. This was much higher than the efficiencies achieved when applying the other coagulants: i.e., Q10 = 7.3 mg Se(IV)/g Fe3+-FeClSO4, Q10 = 6.4 mg Se(IV)/g prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-Fe2(SO4)3 and 0.7 mg Se(IV)/g Al-PACl at pH 6, and Q10 = 0.45 mg Se(IV)/g Fe(II) at pH 7.2. Comparing the different sources of Fe(III), it is apparent that Se(IV) uptake capacity is inhibited by the presence of SO42− in crystal structure of prehydrolyzed Fe2(SO4)3, while prehydrolyzed FeCl3 favors Se(IV) uptake. Temperature effect data showed that coagulation/precipitation is exothermic. In techno-economic terms, the optimal conditions for Se(IV) removal are coagulation/precipitation at pH values lower than 7 using prehydrolyzed Fe(III)-FeCl3, which provides a combination of minimum sludge production and lower operating cost.

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Iron and Aluminum Coagulants on Se(IV) Removal