English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Deep learning-based feature extraction methods and transfer learning have become common approaches in the field of pattern recognition. Deep convolutional neural networks trained using tripled-based loss functions allow for the generation of face embeddings, which can be directly applied to face verification and clustering. Knowledge about the ground truth of face identities might improve the effectiveness of the final classification algorithm; however, it is also possible to use ground truth clusters previously discovered using an unsupervised approach. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the potential improvement of classification results of state-of-the-art supervised classification methods trained with and without ground truth knowledge. In this study, we use two sufficiently large data sets containing more than 200,000 “taken in the wild” images, each with various resolutions, visual quality, and face poses which, in our opinion, guarantee the statistical significance of the results. We examine several clustering and supervised pattern recognition algorithms and find that knowledge about the ground truth has a very small influence on the Fowlkes–Mallows score (FMS) of the classification algorithm. In the case of the classification algorithm that obtained the highest accuracy in our experiment, the FMS improved by only 5.3% (from 0.749 to 0.791) in the first data set and by 6.6% (from 0.652 to 0.718) in the second data set. Our results show that, beside highly secure systems in which face verification is a key component, face identities discovered by unsupervised approaches can be safely used for training supervised classifiers. We also found that the Silhouette Coefficient (SC) of unsupervised clustering is positively correlated with the Adjusted Rand Index, V-measure score, and Fowlkes–Mallows score and, so, we can use the SC as an indicator of clustering performance when the ground truth of face identities is not known. All of these conclusions are important findings for large-scale face verification problems. The reason for this is the fact that skipping the verification of people’s identities before supervised training saves a lot of time and resources.

Comparative Analysis of Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches Applied to Large-Scale “In The Wild” Face Verification