English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Previously, Rahardja (2020) paper (in the first reference list) developed a (pairwise) multiple comparison procedure (MCP) to determine which (proportions) pairs of Multiple Binomial Proportions (with under-reported data), the significant differences came from. Generally, such an MCP test (developed by Rahardja, 2020) is the second part of a two-stage sequential test. In this paper, we derived two omnibus tests (i.e., the overall equality of multiple proportions test) as the first part of the above two-stage sequential test (with under-reported data), in general. Using two likelihood-based approaches, we acquire two Wald-type (Omnibus) tests to compare Multiple Binomial Proportions (in the presence of under-reported data). Our closed-form algorithm is easy to implement and not computationally burdensome. We applied our algorithm to a vehicle-accident data example.

Omnibus Tests for Multiple Binomial Proportions via Doubly Sampled Framework with Under-Reported Data