English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The potential for geogenic Cr(VI) contamination is vast, yet it is difficult to predict susceptible environments as groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations vary significantly, even within a given aquifer, due to physical and hydrologic heterogeneity. The physical structure of soils and sediments exerts a dominant control on Cr(VI) production by dictating the separation distance of reactive phases, the diffusion distance from Cr(VI) generation sites to advecting groundwater, and by influencing infiltration rates and porewater velocity. Here, we used a dual-pore domain model to investigate the relative control of these parameters on Cr(VI) production. The reaction distance between Cr(III)-bearing minerals and Mn oxides predominantly controls Cr(VI) export to advecting groundwater, while changes in diffusion distance between sites of Cr(VI) generation and advective flow channels generally have little impact on steady-state Cr(VI) concentrations. Changes in Cr(VI) diffusion distance can, however, increase the time required for groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations to reach a steady-state; thus, under fluctuating hydrologic and biogeochemical conditions, long diffusion distances still have the potential to suppress Cr(VI) supply to advecting water. Furthermore, we show that high porewater flow velocities effectively dilute Cr(VI) diffusing from soil/sediment aggregates, thus minimizing Cr(VI) concentrations relative to lower porewater velocities. The strong control that the physical/hydrologic parameters exert on Cr(VI) production appears to overwhelm the impact of Cr(III)-mineral solubility within soils and sediments.

Governing Constraints of Chromium(VI) Formation from Chromium(III)-Bearing Minerals in Soils and Sediments