English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Environmental water monitoring requires the estimation of the suspended solids load. In this paper, we compare the concentration range accessible through three different techniques: optical turbidity, acoustic backscattering and the newly in-lab developed time resolved optical turbidity. We focus on their comparison on measurements made in the laboratory on water suspensions of known particles and concentrations. We used laboratory grade kieselguhr, wheat starch and kaolin as suspended solid surrogates. The explored concentration domains are the ones, for the total suspended solid load, commonly encountered in wastewater and rivers in standard (less than 1 g/L to a few g/L) or extreme conditions such as floods or storm events (up to several dozen g/L). Regarding the operable concentration domain, the time resolved optical turbidity shows a clear advantage upon the other methods, whatever the kind of particle is.

Comparison of Time Resolved Optical Turbidity Measurements for Water Monitoring to Standard Real-Time Techniques