English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) level-2 spherical harmonic (SH) solutions are noisy and thus require filtering. Filtering reduces noise but affects signal quality via signal leakage. Generally, a leakage correction is required for GRACE applications to remove leakage signal and recover the true signal. Forward modelling based on some a priori information is a widely used approach for leakage correction of GRACE data. The a priori information generally relies on global hydrological model simulations. There are many global hydrological models and therefore it is of interest to explore how different global hydrology model simulations influence leakage correction results. This study investigated the sensitivity of three leakage correction methods (additive method, scaling factor method and multiplicative method) to five global hydrology model simulations (four models from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) and the WaterGAP Global Hydrology Model (WGHM)). The sensitivity analysis was performed with observational data in Southwest China and one sub-region, Guangxi. Results show that although large differences were identified among the five global model simulations, the additive and scaling factor methods are less affected by the choice of a priori model in comparison to the multiplicative approach. For the additive and scaling factor methods, WGHM outperforms the other four GLDAS models in leakage correction of GRACE data. GRACE data corrected with the multiplicative method shows the highest amount of error, indicating this method is not applicable for leakage correction in the study area. This study also assessed the level-3 mascon (mass concentration) solutions of GRACE data. The mascon-based results are nearly as good as the leakage corrected results based on SH solutions.

sensors

Sensitivity Analysis of Leakage Correction of GRACE Data in Southwest China Using A-Priori Model Simulations: Inter-Comparison of Spherical Harmonics, Mass Concentration and In Situ Observations