English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Traditional inventories require large investments of resources and a trained workforce to measure tree sizes and characteristics that affect wood quality and value, such as the presence of defects and damages. Handheld light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and photogrammetric point clouds developed using Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms achieved promising results in tree detection and dimensional measurements. However, few studies have utilized handheld LiDAR or SfM to assess tree defects or damages. We used a Samsung Galaxy S7 smartphone camera to photograph trees and create digital models using SfM, and a handheld GeoSLAM Zeb Horizon to create LiDAR point cloud models of some of the main tree species from the Pacific Northwest. We compared measurements of damage count and damage length obtained from handheld LiDAR, SfM photogrammetry, and traditional field methods using linear mixed-effects models. The field method recorded nearly twice as many damages per tree as the handheld LiDAR and SfM methods, but there was no evidence that damage length measurements varied between the three survey methods. Lower damage counts derived from LiDAR and SfM were likely driven by the limited point cloud reconstructions of the upper stems, as usable tree heights were achieved, on average, at 13.6 m for LiDAR and 9.3 m for SfM, even though mean field-measured tree heights was 31.2 m. Our results suggest that handheld LiDAR and SfM approaches show potential for detection and measurement of tree damages, at least on the lower stem.

Estimating Tree Defects with Point Clouds Developed from Active and Passive Sensors