English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Basin runoff is a quantity of river discharge per unit basin area monitored close to an estuary mouth, essential for providing information on the flooding and drought conditions of an entire river basin. Owing to a decreasing number of in situ monitoring stations since the late 1970s, basin runoff estimates using remote sensing have been advocated. Previous runoff estimates of the entire Mekong Basin calculated from the water balance equation were achieved through the hybrid use of remotely sensed and model-predicted data products. Nonetheless, these basin runoff estimates revealed a weak consistency with the in situ ones. To address this issue, we provide a newly improved estimate of the monthly Mekong Basin runoff by using the terrestrial water balance equation, purely based on remotely sensed water balance component data products. The remotely sensed water balance component data products used in this study included the satellite precipitation from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), the satellite evapotranspiration from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the inferred terrestrial water storage from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). A comparison of our new estimate and previously published result against the in situ runoff indicated a marked improvement in terms of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC), reaching 0.836 (the new estimate) instead of 0.621 (the previously published result). When a three-month moving-average process was applied to each data product, our new estimate further reached a PCC of 0.932, along with the consistent improvement revealed from other evaluation metrics. Conducting an error analysis of the estimated mean monthly runoff for the entire data timespan, we found that the usage of different evapotranspiration data products had a substantial influence on the estimated runoff. This indicates that the choice of evapotranspiration data product is critical in the remotely sensed runoff estimation.

Improved Mekong Basin Runoff Estimate and Its Error Characteristics Using Pure Remotely Sensed Data Products