English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Vertical deformations caused by non-tidal mass variations still remain in global navigation satellite system (GNSS) height time series, and can be computed from both Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and geophysical models. In this study, we provide a thorough evaluation of the relationships between these different techniques in the global scale by comparing non-tidal vertical deformations from IGS second reprocessing campaign (IG2), GRACE and Global Geophysical Fluid Center (GGFC) solutions, and investigate the noise properties of the GNSS corrected by GRACE solutions and GNSS corrected by GGFC solutions for global stations using optimal noise models. Our results demonstrate that the consistency between seasonal vertical deformations derived from GNSS, GRACE and GGFC is high. When correcting GNSS deformations with GRACE and GGFC solutions, 81% and 73% of the 186 stations have the weight root mean square (WRMS) reduction, respectively. The WRMS variations averaged over all stations are −12.3% and −5.6%, respectively for GNSS corrected by GRACE and GNSS corrected by GGFC solutions. The obvious difference occurs in the GNSS corrected by GGFC solutions WRMS increase, with the mean increase value up to 29%, mainly happening to stations located on islands or small peninsulas. In addition, noise properties of the GNSS corrected by GRACE solutions and GNSS corrected by GGFC solutions for global stations are investigated using optimal noise models. After correcting non-tidal loading effects, the solutions of GNSS corrected by GRACE solutions have the lowest noise level, and can occupy 5% of the noise behavior presenting in global stations, while the solutions of GNSS corrected by GGFC solutions can bring more than 5% of the noise into global stations, implying that GRACE correction solutions can present more favorable results when interpreting GNSS non-tidal loading deformations.

Non-Tidal Mass Variations in the IGS Second Reprocessing Campaign: Interpretations and Noise Analysis from GRACE and Geophysical Models