English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Estimating leaf area index (LAI) and assessing spatial variation in LAI across a landscape is crucial to many ecological studies. Several direct and indirect methods of LAI estimation have been developed and compared; however, many of these methods are prohibitively expensive and/or time consuming. Here, we examine the feasibility of using the free image processing software CAN-EYE to estimate effective plant area index (PAIeff) from hemispherical canopy images taken with an extremely inexpensive smartphone clip-on fisheye lens. We evaluate the effectiveness of this inexpensive method by comparing CAN-EYE smartphone PAIeff estimates to those from drone lidar over a lowland tropical forest at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. We estimated PAIeff from drone lidar using a method based in radiative transfer theory that has been previously validated using simulated data; we consider this a conservative test of smartphone PAIeff reliability because above-canopy lidar estimates share few assumptions with understory image methods. Smartphone PAIeff varied from 0.1 to 4.4 throughout our study area and we found a significant correlation (r = 0.62, n = 42, p < 0.001) between smartphone and lidar PAIeff, which was robust to image processing analytical options and smartphone model. When old growth and secondary forests are assumed to have different leaf angle distributions for the lidar PAIeff algorithm (spherical and planophile, respectively) this relationship is further improved (r = 0.77, n = 42, p < 0.001). However, we found deviations in the magnitude of the PAIeff estimations depending on image analytical options. Our results suggest that smartphone images can be used to characterize spatial variation in PAIeff in a complex, heterogenous tropical forest canopy, with only small reductions in explanatory power compared to true digital hemispherical photography.

Comparison of Smartphone and Drone Lidar Methods for Characterizing Spatial Variation in PAI in a Tropical Forest