English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this study, the effect of plasma treatment on glass-cloth-containing polytetrafluoroethylene (GC–PTFE) was investigated. Previous plasma studies investigated pure PTFE (which does not contain glass cloth) but not GC–PTFE. The effect of Ar + H2O plasma treatment on GC–PTFE was investigated. The Ar + H2O plasma-treated GC–PTFE sheets were thermally compressed to stainless steel (SUS304) foils without using adhesive, and the GC–PTFE/SUS304 adhesion strengths were measured using a 90° peel test. The adhesion strength increased with the increase in the plasma treatment time (0.8 and 1.0 N/mm at 20 s and 300 s, respectively). Thus, strong adhesion between GC–PTFE/SUS304 was achieved without adhesive. This improvement in the adhesion properties of GC–PTFE can be attributed to the generation of oxygen-containing functional groups and the decrease in the surface roughness of the samples. Thereafter, the adhesion properties of GC–PTFE and pure PTFE were compared. Because, unlike pure PTFE, GC–PTFE has no weak boundary layer, GC–PTFE exhibited better adhesion properties than pure PTFE under short plasma treatment times.

polymers

Adhesive-Free Adhesion between Plasma-Treated Glass-Cloth-Containing Polytetrafluoroethylene (GC–PTFE) and Stainless Steel: Comparison between GC–PTFE and Pure PTFE