English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A series of MnO x -CeO₂ and MnO x -TiO₂ catalysts were prepared by a homogeneous precipitation method and their catalytic activities for the NO oxidation in the absence or presence of SO₂ were evaluated. Results show that the optimal molar ratio of Mn/Ce and Mn/Ti are 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. The MnO x -CeO₂ catalyst exhibits higher catalytic activity and better resistance to SO₂ poisoning than the MnO x -TiO₂ catalyst. On the basis of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning transmission electron microscope with mapping (STEM-mapping) analyses, it is seen that the MnO x -CeO₂ catalyst possesses higher BET surface area and better dispersion of MnO x over the catalyst than MnO x -TiO₂ catalyst. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements reveal that MnO x -CeO₂ catalyst provides the abundance of Mn 3+ and more surface adsorbed oxygen, and SO₂ might be preferentially adsorbed to the surface of CeO₂ to form sulfate species, which provides a protection of MnO x active sites from being poisoned. In contrast, MnO x active sites over the MnO x -TiO₂ catalyst are easily and quickly sulfated, leading to rapid deactivation of the catalyst for NO oxidation. Furthermore, temperature programmed desorption with NO and O₂ (NO + O₂-TPD) and in situ diffuse reflectance infrared transform spectroscopy (in situ DRIFTS) characterizations results show that the MnO x -CeO₂ catalyst displays much stronger ability to adsorb NO x than the MnO x -TiO₂ catalyst, especially after SO₂ poisoning.

Catalytic Oxidation of NO over MnOx–CeO2 and MnOx–TiO2 Catalysts