English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The behaviour of steel structures is affected by two nonlinearities—the geometric and material nonlinearity—and by the unavoidable presence of imperfections. To evaluate the ultimate capacity of a structure, these effects should be taken into consideration during the design process, either explicitly in the analysis or implicitly through the verification checks. In this context, Eurocode 3 provides several design approaches of different complexity and accuracy. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are discussed. Five different methods in conformity with the Eurocode provisions are applied for the design of four moment resisting steel frames of varying slenderness. The influence of nonlinearities and imperfections in respect to the slenderness of the structure is illustrated. The examined methods are compared in terms of the predicted ultimate capacity and their efficiency is assessed against the most accurate between them, i.e., an advanced geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis. It is shown that considerable differences arise between the methods. Nevertheless, except for the commonly used 2nd order analysis followed by cross-section verifications, the remaining methods are mostly on the safe side.

EC3-Compatible Methods for Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Structures