English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We estimated the stock market risk premium during the COVID-19 pandemic with a GARCH-in-Mean (GARCH-M)(1,1) model. The analysis then explored the presence of regime changes using a two-regime Markov-Switching GARCH (MS GARCH)(1,1) model. The sample we used included the stock market indexes of nine countries from three geographical regions, including: North America (Canada, USA, and Mexico), South America (Brazil and Argentina), and Asia (Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore), over two periods: (a) pre-COVID (from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019); and (b) COVID (from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021). Our GARCH-M(1,1) estimation results indicate that the more developed countries’ stock markets experienced an important increase in their risk premium during the COVID period, likely explained by the massive government anticyclical policies. By contrast, developing countries’ stock markets, particularly in Latin America, experienced a reduction, and in some cases, even a total loss of the risk premium effect. From the perspective of investors and portfolio risk managers, the identification of high and low volatility periods and their estimated probability of occurrence is useful for the characterization of stress scenarios and the design of emerging strategies. For governments and central bankers, the implementation of different policies should respond to the more likely scenarios but should also be prepared to respond to other less likely scenarios. Institutional preparedness to respond to as many different scenarios as may be identified with the use of MS GARCH models can make their interventions more successful. This work presents an objective example of how the use of MS GARCH models may be of use to practitioners in both the financial industry and government. We confirmed that the results of a two-regime MS GARCH model are superior to those obtained from a single-regime model.

COVID Asymmetric Impact on the Risk Premium of Developed and Emerging Countries’ Stock Markets