English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A series of mathematical models were proposed to calculate the roll force, torque and power for cold strip asymmetrical rolling by means of the slab method, taking the percentages of the forward-slip, backward-slip and cross-shear zones into account. The friction power, plastic work and total energy consumption can be obtained by the models. The effects of variable rolling parameters—such as the speed ratio, entry thickness, friction coefficient and front and back tension—on the process of asymmetrical rolling are analyzed. In all cases, an increase in speed ratio leads to an increase in friction work and its proportions. The increase in entry thickness and deformation resistance causes both friction work and plastic deformation work to increase. The proportion of friction work decreases with increasing deformation resistance, entry thickness, front tension and back tension. In the circumstances of a thin strip being rolled with a large speed ratio, the proportion of friction work could exceed that of plastic deformation work. The concept of a threshold point of friction work was proposed to explain this phenomenon. As an example, threshold points T1, T2, T3 with the effect of the entry thickness and S1, S2, S3 with the effect of the friction coefficient have been obtained by computation. Finally, the experiment of the strip asymmetrical rolling was conducted, and a maximum error of 9.7% and an RMS error of 5.9% were found in the comparison of roll forces between experimental measurement values and calculated ones.

Analysis of Mechanical Parameters of Asymmetrical Rolling Dealing with Three Region Percentages in Deformation Zones