English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this paper, we measured the fracture properties of cement mortar—which is composed of sand and has a nearly constant diameter—using a direct tension test. Four double-notched mortar bar specimens with different structural dimensions were assessed. The failure load, load-crack mouth opening displacement, and elongation of the gauge length were measured under direct displacement control. The fractured surfaces were scanned and measured so that we could calculate the tensile strength accurately and determine the fracture energy and characteristic length. The average ratio of total fracture energy (G F ) to specific fracture energy (G f ) was 1.94; this was lower than the typical value for concrete, of 2.5. The direct tension test showed that the double-notched mortar specimens had a smaller fracture processing zone after the initiation of tensile cracks, so the tail portion of the softening branch was small. This decreased the G F /G f  ratio. We verified this result based on a nonlinear fracture mechanics simulation and found that it agreed well with our experimental results. We also investigated the size effects of four different scaled specimens while holding the ratio of structural dimension, d, and notch length, a is constant, so that there was no shape effect. The traditional linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) prediction and Bažant’s size effect law yield a gradient closer to 1/2 in the case of relatively large specimens. In the case of our cement mortar specimens, this prediction was not supported, where the value of the slope was 1/0.727. This was unexpected because LEFM predicts strong size effects. One possible explanation for this result is that the size effects of concrete are most often evaluated using a bending test; also, concrete has a larger maximum aggregate size than mortar. Due to the random heterogeneities in aggregate distribution, higher tail energies may be seen for concrete, leading to differences in the G F /G f  ratio. At the same time, the peak tensile stress could be affected by the relationship between structural dimensions and aggregate size.

Fracture Parameters of Cement Mortar with Different Structural Dimensions Under the Direct Tension Test