English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background : The ideal timing of genital surgery in differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) is controversial and differs according to the underlying type of DSD. Increasing numbers of persisting sinus as a result of delayed feminizing genitoplasty in DSD patients require interdisciplinary collaboration of pediatric surgeons/urologists and gynecologists. This study focusses on surgical techniques other than bowel vaginoplasties and results of gender assigning surgery in young adolescents. Methods: Data of adolescent and adult patients treated between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively: underlying type of malformation, techniques of vaginoplasty, vaginal length and caliber, possibility of sexual intercourse, and temporary vaginal dilatation. Results: A total of 9 patients received a primary vaginoplasty at a median age of 16.75 years (range 10.3-29.25). The underlying anatomical conditions were persistent urogenital sinus (UGS) in 8 patients (3 patients with CAH, 2 patients with XY-DSD, 1 patient with cloacal malformation and missed UGS, 2 patients with UGS only). One patient had a MURCS association. Surgical techniques were total urogenital mobilization and perineal flap vaginoplasty in 4 patients, modified McIndoe vaginoplasty in 4 patients, and a laparoscopic vaginal pull-through in 1 patient. In a median follow-up of 45 months (2-84), all but 1 patient presented with physiological vaginal length and width. Conclusions: If possible, modern treatment concepts delay gender assigning surgery until the participation of the patient in the decision-making process is possible. Optimal treatment concepts are given by transfer of surgical techniques from pediatric urology/surgery by multidisciplinary teams. Techniques other than bowel vaginoplasties are favorable.

Techniques of Primary Vaginoplasty in Young Adults with Differences of Sex Development and Female Identification