English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) facilitates the assessment of short-term glucose variability and identification of acute excursions of hyper- and hypo-glycemia. Among 37 diabetic hemodialysis patients who underwent 7-day CGM with the iPRO2 device (Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, CA, USA), we explored the accuracy of glycated albumin (GA) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in assessing glycemic control, using CGM-derived metrics as the reference standard. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosing a time in the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL (TIR 70-180 ) in &lt;50% of readings was higher for GA (AUC: 0.878; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.728-0.962) as compared to HbA1c (AUC: 0.682; 95% CI: 0.508-0.825) ( p &lt; 0.01). The accuracy of GA (AUC: 0.939; 95% CI: 0.808-0.991) in detecting a time above the target glucose range &gt; 250 mg/dL (TAR &gt;250 ) in &gt;10% of readings did not differ from that of HbA1c (AUC: 0.854; 95% CI: 0.699-0.948) ( p = 0.16). GA (AUC: 0.712; 95% CI: 0.539-0.848) and HbA1c (AUC: 0.740; 95% CI: 0.570-0.870) had a similarly lower efficiency in detecting a time below target glucose range &lt; 70 mg/dL (TBR &lt;70 ) in &gt;1% of readings ( p = 0.71). Although the mean glucose levels were similar, the coefficient of variation of glucose recordings (39.2 ± 17.3% vs. 32.0 ± 7.8%, p &lt; 0.001) and TBR &lt;70 (median (range): 5.6% (0, 25.8) vs. 2.8% (0, 17.9)) were higher during the dialysis-on than during the dialysis-off day. In conclusion, the present study shows that among diabetic hemodialysis patients, GA had higher accuracy than HbA1c in detecting a 7-day CGM-derived TIR 70-180 &lt; 50%. However, both biomarkers provided an imprecise reflection of acute excursions of hypoglycemia and inter-day glucose variability.

journal of clinical medicine

Assessment of Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia and Inter-Day Glucose Variability Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Diabetic Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis