English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Binary self-dual codes and additive self-dual codes over GF(4) contain common points. Both have Type I codes and Type II codes, as well as shadow codes. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive description of extremal and near-extremal Type I codes over GF(2) and GF(4) with minimal shadow. In particular, we prove that there is no near-extremal Type I [24m,12m,2m+2] binary self-dual code with minimal shadow if m≥323, and we prove that there is no near-extremal Type I (6m+1,26m+1,2m+1) additive self-dual code over GF(4) with minimal shadow if m≥22.

Near-Extremal Type I Self-Dual Codes with Minimal Shadow over GF(2) and GF(4)