English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

(1) Background: Dental implantology has been rapidly developing over the last decades. The introduction of new materials, surface modifications and implant designs has brought the need to rethink and systematize our knowledge regarding dental implants. Thus, the aim of this paper is to introduce a new classification and implant positioning indications that can be used to maximize the survival rate and the aesthetic outcome of single-piece compressive screw implants. (2) Materials and methods: This classification was based on a multicenter clinical and radiological observation of 151 patients, in whom 1057 implants were placed with a success rate of 98.5% (1041). The follow-up period was up to 82 months with a mean of 22.34 months. (3) Results: it seems that, in the case of single-piece implants, diameter and length of the implant have influence on their survival rate, whereas smoking and hypertension do not. (4) Conclusions: this paper provides clinicians with comprehensive information about the rationale, criteria and implementation of the new classifications based on a large number of implants and long-term observations.

Clinically Based Classification and Positioning Indication for Single-Piece Compressive Implants Placement in Regard to Extraction Socket