English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The relative growth rate (RGRnv) is the standardized measurement of forest growth, whereby excluding the size differences between individuals allows their performance to be compared equally. The RGRnv model was developed using the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data on the Daxing’an Mountains, in Northeast China, which contain Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii Rupr.), white birch (Betula platyphylla Suk.), and mixed coniferous–broadleaf forests. Four predictor variables—i.e., quadratic mean diameter (Dq), stand basal area (G), average tree height (Ha), and altitude (A)—and four different methods—i.e., the nonlinear mixed-effects models (NLME), three nonlinear quantile regression (NQR3), five nonlinear quantile regression (NQR5), and nine nonlinear quantile regression (NQR9) models—were used in this study. All the models were validated using the leave-one-out method. The results showed that (1) the mixed coniferous–broadleaf forest presented the highest RGRnv; (2) the RGRnv was negatively correlated with the four predictors, and the heteroscedasticity reduced significantly after the weighting function was integrated into the models; and (3) the quantile regression models performed better than NLME, and NQR9 outperformed both NQR3 and NQR5. To make more accurate predictions, parameters of the adjusted mixed-effects and quantile regression models should be recalculated and localized using sampled RGRnv in each region and then applied to predict all the other RGRnv of plots. MAPE% indicates the mean absolute percentage error. The values were stable when the sample numbers were greater than or equal to six across the three forest types, which showed relatively accurate and lowest-cost prediction results.

forests

Stand Volume Growth Modeling with Mixed-Effects Models and Quantile Regressions for Major Forest Types in the Eastern Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China