English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Coal structure directly correlates to permeability and hydraulic fracturing effects. Underground coal mining indicates that a single coal section generally contains multiple coal structures in superposition, making how to recognise the coal structure combination and predict its influence on coal permeability a challenging problem. Based on well-drilling sampled cores, the geological strength index (GSI), and well-logging data, the DEN, GR, CALX, and CALY were selected to establish a model to predict GSI by multiple regression to identify coal structure from 100 coalbed methane wells. Based on fitting GSI and corresponding permeability test values, injection fall-off (IFO) testing, and hydraulic fracturing results, permeability prediction models for pre- and post-fracturing behaviour were established, respectively. The fracturing effect was evaluated by the difference in permeability. The results show that a reservoir can be classified into one of nine types by different coal structure thickness proportion (and combinations thereof) and the fracturing curves can be classified into four categories (and eight sub-categories) by the pressure curve. Up-down type I and type II reservoirs (proportion of hard coal &gt;60%) and intervening interval type I reservoir (proportion of hard coal &gt;70%) are prone to form stable and descending fracturing curves and the fracturing effects are optimal. Intervening interval type II (hard coal:soft coal:hard coal or soft coal:hard coal:soft coal ≈1:1:1) and up-down type III (hard coal:soft coal =1:1) form descending type II, rising type I and fluctuating type I fracturing curves and fracturing effect ranks second; up-down type IV and V (proportion of hard coal &lt;40%), interval type III (proportion of hard coal &lt;30%), and multi-layer superposition-type reservoirs readily form fluctuating and rising fracturing curves and fracturing effects therein are poor. The research results provide guidance for the targeted stimulation measured under different coal structure combinations.

Classification of Coal Structure Combinations and Their Influence on Hydraulic Fracturing: A Case Study from the Qinshui Basin, China