English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Thanks to the support of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) provide a navigation positioning solution that, in the absence of satellite signals (in tunnels, forest and urban areas), allows the continuous positioning of a moving object (air, land and sea). Passenger and freight trains must, for safety reasons, comply with several formal navigation requirements, particularly those that concern the minimum acceptable accuracy for determining their position. Depending on the type of task performed by the train (positioning a vehicle on a route, stopping at a turnout, stopping at a platform, monitoring the movement of rolling stock, etc.), the train must have positioning systems that can determine its position with sufficient accuracy (1–10 m, p = 0.95) to perform the tasks in question. A wide range of INS/GNSS equipment is currently available, ranging from very costly to simple solutions based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), which, in addition to an inertial unit, use one or two GNSS receivers. The paper presents an assessment of the accuracy of both types of solutions by testing them simultaneously in dynamic measurements. The research, due to the costs and logistics complexity, was made using a passenger car. The surveys were carried out in a complex way, because the measurement route was travelled three times at four different speeds: 40 km/h, 80 km/h, 100 km/h and 120 km/h on seven representative test sections with diverse land development. In order to determine the positioning accuracy of INS devices, two precise GNSS geodetic receivers (2 cm accuracy, p = 0.95) were used as a reference positioning system. The measurements demonstrated that only INS/GNSS systems based on two receivers can meet the requirements of most railway applications related to rail navigation, and since a solution with a single GNSS receiver has a much lower positioning accuracy, it is not suitable for many railway applications. It is noted that considerable differences between the standards defining the navigation requirements for railway applications. For example, INS/GNSS systems based on two receivers meet the vast majority of the expectations specified in the Report on Rail User Needs and Requirements. However, according to the Federal Radionavigation Plan (FRP), it cannot be used in any railway application.

Road Tests of the Positioning Accuracy of INS/GNSS Systems Based on MEMS Technology for Navigating Railway Vehicles