English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

With several divided stages, placement and routing are the most critical and challenging steps in VLSI physical design. To ensure that physical implementation problems can be manageable and converged in a reasonable runtime, placement/routing problems are usually further split into several sub-problems, which may cause conservative margin reservation and mis-correlation. Therefore, it is desirable to design an algorithm that can accurately and efficiently consider placement and routing simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a detailed placement and global routing co-optimization algorithm while considering complex routing constraints to avoid conservative margin reservation and mis-correlation in placement/routing stages. Firstly, we present a rapidly preprocessing technology based on R-tree to improve the initial routing results. After that, a BFS-based approximate optimal addressing algorithm in 3D is designed to find a proper destination for cell movement. We propose an optimal region selection algorithm based on the partial routing solution to jump out of the local optimal solution. Further, a fast partial net rip-up and rerouted algorithm is used in the process of cell movement. Finally, we adopt an efficient refinement technique to reduce the routing length further. Compared with the top 3 winners according to the 2020 ICCAD CAD contest benchmarks, the experimental results show that our algorithm achieves the best routing length reduction for all cases with a shorter runtime. On average, our algorithm can improve 0.7%, 1.5%, and 1.7% for the first, second, and third place, respectively. In addition, we can still obtain the best results after relaxing the maximum cell movement constraint, which further illustrates the effectiveness of our algorithm.

Detailed Placement and Global Routing Co-Optimization with Complex Constraints