English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Face detection by electronic systems has been leveraged by private and government establishments to enhance the effectiveness of a wide range of applications in our day to day activities, security, and businesses. Most face detection algorithms that can reduce the problems posed by constrained and unconstrained environmental conditions such as unbalanced illumination, weather condition, distance from the camera, and background variations, are highly computationally intensive. Therefore, they are primarily unemployable in real-time applications. This paper developed face detectors by utilizing selected Haar-like and local binary pattern features, based on their number of uses at each stage of training using MATLAB’s trainCascadeObjectDetector function. We used 2577 positive face samples and 37,206 negative samples to train Haar-like and LBP face detectors for a range of False Alarm Rate (FAR) values (i.e., 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1). However, the study shows that the Haar cascade face detector at a low stage (i.e., at six stages) for 0.1 FAR value is the most efficient when tested on a set of classroom images dataset with 100% True Positive Rate (TPR) face detection accuracy. Though, deep learning ResNet101 and ResNet50 outperformed the average performance of Haar cascade by 9.09% and 0.76% based on TPR, respectively. The simplicity and relatively low computational time used by our approach (i.e., 1.09 s) gives it an edge over deep learning (139.5 s), in online classroom applications. The TPR of the proposed algorithm is 92.71% when tested on images in the synthetic Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) dataset and 98.55% for images in MUCT face dataset “a”, resulting in a little improvement in average TPR over the conventional face identification system.

Custom Face Classification Model for Classroom Using Haar-Like and LBP Features with Their Performance Comparisons