English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The validation of a previously developed model of the interaction between the red pigment-concentrating hormone of Daphnia pulex and its cognate receptor (Jackson et al., IJBM 106, 969-978, 2018) was undertaken. Single amino acid replacements, noticeably an Ala scan, of the ligand, Dappu-RPCH, were docked to the receptor, and the binding energies calculated and compared to the one with Dappu-RPCH. As a second step, the same molecules were docked using molecular dynamics (MD) in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) membrane. Changes in binding energy were compared to previous results on in vitro receptor activation (Marco et al., Sci. Rep. 7, 6851, 2017). Residue scanning and MD simulations both gave comparable results for binding energy. For most mutants, there was a good inverse correlation between in vitro activity and binding. There were, however, exceptions; for example: [Ala4]Dappu-RPCH bound as tightly as the cognate ligand but had little activity. This seeming discrepancy was explained when the MD data were analyzed in detail, showing that, although [Ala4]Dappu-RPCH had multiple interactions with the receptor accounting for the high binding energy, the interacting residues of the receptor were quite different to those of Dappu-RPCH. The MD calculations show clearly that the strong binding affinity of the ligand to the receptor is not sufficient for activation. Interaction of the binding of the ligand to two residues of the receptor, Ser 155 and Gln 237, is also essential. A comparison of our computational results with the experimental results of Marco et al. and comparison with the extensive data on GnRH supports the validity of our Dappu-RPCH R model.

biomolecules

Insights into the Activation of a Crustacean G Protein-Coupled Receptor: Evaluation of the Red Pigment-Concentrating Hormone Receptor of the Water Flea Daphnia pulex (Dappu-RPCH R)