English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

(1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-derived parameters, such as the commonly used standardized uptake value (SUV) and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), have been proposed for response assessment in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the calculation of whole-body PSMA-TV remains a time-consuming procedure. We hypothesized that it may be possible to quantify changes in PSMA-TV by considering only a limited number of representative lesions. (2) Methods: Sixty-five patients classified into different disease stages were assessed by PSMA PET/CT for staging and restaging after therapy. Whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body SUVmax were calculated. We then repeated this calculation only including the five or ten hottest or largest lesions. The corresponding serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were also determined. The derived delta between baseline and follow-up values provided the following parameters: ΔSUVmaxall, ΔSUVmax10, ΔSUVmax5, ΔPSMA-TVall, ΔPSMA-TV10, ΔPSMA-TV5, ΔPSA. Finally, we compared the findings from our whole-body segmentation with the results from our keyhole approach (focusing on a limited number of lesions) and correlated all values with the biochemical response (ΔPSA). (3) Results: Among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), none showed a relevant deviation for ΔSUVmax10/ΔSUVmax5 or ΔPSMA-TV10/ΔPSMA-TV5 compared to ΔSUVmaxall and ΔPSMA-TVall. For patients treated with taxanes, up to 6/21 (28.6%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only up to 2/21 (9.5%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. For patients treated with radioligand therapy (RLT), up to 5/28 (17.9%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only 1/28 (3.6%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. The highest correlations with ΔPSA were found for ΔPSMA-TVall (r ≥ 0.59, p ≤ 0.01), followed by ΔPSMA-TV10 (r ≥ 0.57, p ≤ 0.01) and ΔPSMA-TV5 (r ≥ 0.53, p ≤ 0.02) in all cohorts. ΔPSA only correlated with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.60, p = 0.02) and with ΔSUVmax10 (r = 0.53, p = 0.03) in the mHSPC cohort, as well as with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.51, p = 0.01) in the RLT cohort. (4) Conclusion: Response assessment using PSMA-TV with a reduced number of lesions is feasible, and may allow for a simplified evaluation process for PSMA PET/CT.

biology

Reduced Segmentation of Lesions Is Comparable to Whole-Body Segmentation for Response Assessment by PSMA PET/CT: Initial Experience with the Keyhole Approach