English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Mechanical ventilation consumes a huge amount of global energy. Natural ventilation is a crucial solution for reducing energy consumption and enhancing the capacity of atmospheric self-purification. This paper evaluates the impacts of indoor-outdoor temperature differences on building ventilation and indoor-outdoor air pollutant dispersion in urban areas. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method is employed to simulate the flow fields in the street canyon and indoor environment. Ventilation conditions of single-side ventilation mode and cross-ventilation mode are investigated. Air change rate, normalized concentration of traffic-related air pollutant (CO), intake fraction and exposure concentration are calculated to for ventilation efficiency investigation and exposure assessment. The results show that cross ventilation increases the air change rate for residential buildings under isothermal conditions. With the indoor-outdoor temperature difference, heating could increase the air change rate of the single-side ventilation mode but restrain the capability of the cross-ventilation mode in part of the floors. Heavier polluted areas appear in the upstream areas of single-side ventilation modes, and the pollutant can diffuse to middle-upper floors in cross-ventilation modes. Cross ventilation mitigates the environmental health stress for the indoor environment when indoor-outdoor temperature difference exits and the personal intake fraction is decreased by about 66% compared to the single-side ventilation. Moreover, the existence of indoor-outdoor temperature differences can clearly decrease the risk of indoor personal exposure under both two natural ventilation modes. The study numerically investigates the building ventilation and pollutant dispersion in the urban community with natural ventilation. The method and the results are helpful references for optimizing the building ventilation plan and improving indoor air quality.

Impact of Indoor-Outdoor Temperature Difference on Building Ventilation and Pollutant Dispersion within Urban Communities