English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In July 2020, this journal published “A User-Friendly Tool to Characterize the Moisture Transfer in Porous Building Materials: FLoW1D”. That article presents and applies a forward-Euler-based tool, implemented in Visual Basic for Applications in Excel, for simulating moisture transfer in building materials. In that tool, the building materials’ hygric properties are described via the unimodal van Genuchten and Mualem equations. All parameters needed therein are inversely identified from only a capillary absorption experiment. These are three feats that, if valid, would strongly progress the state-of-the-art on moisture transfer simulation, hygric property description, and hygric property characterisation. This critique voices severe doubts, however, about the applicability of FLoW1D, the adequacy of the van Genuchten-Mualem equations, and (most fundamentally) the uniqueness of the inverse characterisation.

Comment on Cabrera et al. A User-Friendly Tool to Characterize the Moisture Transfer in Porous Building Materials: FLoW1D. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5090