English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dynamic stall in clean air flow has been well studied, but its exploration in air–particle (air–raindrop or air–sand) flow is still lacking. The aerodynamic performance loss of aircraft (NACA0012) and wind turbine (S809) airfoils and their differences during the hysteresis loop at different pitching parameters are also poorly understood. As shown in this paper, the reduced frequency has little effect on the value of the maximum lift coefficient increment caused by particles, but a larger one can enhance the hysteresis effect and drag the angle of attack, at which the maximum increment is obtained, from the up stroke to the down stroke. The large lift coefficient increments of two airfoils and their difference also have a similar change trend with the reduced frequency. Compared to that of NACA0012 airfoil, the increments of S809 airfoil are obviously greater at three mean angles of attack, especially at 8°, which is the commonly used operating angle. In addition, the angle of attack, at which the maximum lift coefficient is obtained, can be significantly changed by particles in two regions: one is under the effect of deep stall, the other is under the effect of light stall at a low, reduced frequency.

Comparative Study of Dynamic Stall between an Aircraft Airfoil and a Wind Turbine Airfoil in an Air–Particle Flow