English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Measuring lower extremity joint angles during cycling is interesting to derive joint loading from contact forces at the pedals and to determine the cause of cycling injuries. Traditionally, joint angles are determined in a stationary setup with high-resolution cameras that track marker movement in a lab environment. Alternatively, joint angles can be estimated mathematically in-situ: the lower extremities, bicycle frame and pedal arms are presented as a 5 bar linkage system which is fully defined by the lower extremity segment lengths, seat height and pedal position. As most instrumented pedals for power measurements include pedal orientation measurements, the bar linkage system demands no special equipment to derive joint loadings from pedal loads. The aim of this study is to validate the bar linkage system for joint angle estimation in the sagittal plane during in-situ cycling. Ten subjects cycled on a stationary bike while the hip, knee and ankle angles were measured with a Vicon optoelectronic motion capture system and simultaneously calculated with the bar linkage system. The results were averaged to subject-specific and method-specific ensemble average curves in the function of the phase in the pedal cycle and compared by a correlation analysis, Bland Altman plot, and Spm1D paired T-test. The hip and knee angle estimation of the bar linkage system showed no statistically significant difference from the optoelectronic system. Moreover, the ankle showed a statistically significant difference in the last half of the recovery phase of the pedal cycle. As the difference was maximally 3°, it has no clinical significance when deriving joint loading from contact forces at the pedal.

Validation of a Bar Linkage Model for Joint Angle Estimation during Cycling