English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

For electromagnetic (EM) modeling based on the electric-field formulation at low frequencies, the quasi-static approximation (i.e., only the conduction current is considered and the displacement current is ignored) is commonly applied, and a small conductivity value for the air layer is chosen subjectively. Actually, in the air layer, due to the use of the small conductivity value, the quasi-static approximation is ubiquitously violated. However, the effect of the violation of the quasi-static approximation in the air on EM modeling is not well examined in the literature. In this paper, we investigate this issue by comparing the finite-difference modeling results from the calculation with the quasi-static approximation and those considering both the conduction and displacement currents. For the quasi-static approximation, the conductivity in the air is set to be different small values, and zero air conductivity is used for the modeling with both the conduction and displacement currents considered. Several simple models are designed to verify the numerical solution and study how the assigned conductivity for the air affects the modeling accuracy. One flat model and two models with topography are designed to examine the effect of the quasi-static approximation on the EM modeling results. For frequencies used in typical geophysical applications of EM diffusion, using the quasi-static approximation is able to produce accurate modeling results for models with typical earth conductivity. However, if the rough surface topography is considered, the use of the quasi-static approximation can reduce the EM modeling accuracy substantially at much lower frequencies (as low as several hundred Hz), which is probably due to the inaccurate description of EM waves in the air, and poses problems for applications based on direct EM field interpretation.

Effect of Displacement Current on the Finite-Difference Modeling of Natural Source Electromagnetic Diffusion