English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper compares two different approaches to deriving shading coefficients (weights) for optimal first order and second order directional sensors (that is; sonobuoys, vectors and dyadic sensors). The first approach is an analytical or a physics-based derivation, involving computations with gradients and linearized momentum; the second is an adaptive minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) derivation, which finds weights that minimize the cross spectral density (CSD) matrix. The two approaches are shown to be equivalent. In other words, the adaptive MVDR processing procedure does indeed converge to a physics-based solution, without any pre-existing physical knowledge of the behavior of the acoustic field. This suggests that adaptive algorithms innately seek physics-based solutions when these solutions are optimum. The intent of this short communication is not to advocate for one type of adaptive processing method over another. The observation that is presented here is important though, it confirms that at least in an idealized noise field, adaptive processing converges on an optimal set of shading coefficients, similarly derived based on well-established physical acoustics.

A Comparison of Optimal SONAR Array Amplitude Shading Coefficients