English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The simultaneous optimization of aircraft shape and internal structural size for transonic flight is excessively costly. The analysis of the governing physics is expensive, in particular for highly flexible aircraft, and the search for optima using analysis samples can scale poorly with design space size. This paper has a two-fold purpose targeting the scalable reduction of analysis sampling. First, a new algorithm is explored for computing design derivatives by analytically linking objective definition, geometry differentiation, mesh construction, and analysis. The analytic computation of design derivatives enables the accurate use of more efficient gradient-based optimization methods. Second, the scalability of a multi-fidelity algorithm is assessed for optimization in high dimensions. This method leverages a multi-fidelity model during the optimization line search for further reduction of sampling costs. The multi-fidelity optimization is demonstrated for cases of aerodynamic and aeroelastic design considering both shape and structural sizing separately and in combination with design spaces ranging from 17 to 321 variables, which would be infeasible using typical, surrogate-based methods. The multi-fidelity optimization consistently led to a reduction in high-fidelity evaluations compared to single-fidelity optimization for the aerodynamic shape problems, but frequently resulted in a cost penalty for cases involving structural sizing. While the multi-fidelity optimizer was successfully applied to problems with hundreds of variables, the results underscore the importance of accurately computing gradients and motivate the extension of the approach to constrained optimization methods.

Multi-Fidelity Gradient-Based Optimization for High-Dimensional Aeroelastic Configurations