English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEn 1973 Charles Beitz reconstruyo un modelo idealista global de justicia redistributiva utilizando los principios de la teoria Rawlsaniana, como son el velo de la ignorancia y la reparticion equitativa de libertades y recursos. Beitz, que partio de premisas cosmopolitas liberales, dedico su estudio a los desequilibrios que existen dentro del sistema internacional, planteando justamente que las causas de la desigual reparticion de recursos corresponden a articulaciones sistemicas. Este texto que consta de tres apartados, discutira si la representacion de Charles Beitz sobre la justicia global es satisfactoria o no. En la primera parte se expondra el argumento idealista del autor, en el segundo apartado se resaltaran las falacias teoricas que se puede encontrar en dicha propuesta, y la ultima parte se dejara para prescribir un balance de la moral realista que mantienen los estados y como dichos principios aun imperan dentro del sistema internacional. English1973 Charles Beitz used the principles of Rawls's Theory of Justice such as the veil of ignorance and the fair redistribution of liberties and resources to reconstruct a cosmopolitan model of redistributive justice, Beitz, who used liberal and cosmopolitan premises in his theory, has dedicated his analysis to study the imbalances that exist within the international system, rightly arguing that the causes of unfair distribution of resources are systemically produced. This text, which consists of three sections, will discuss whether Charles Beitz's representation of global justice is satisfactory or not. The first part will analyse Beitz´s idealist argument, whereas the second section will expose the theoretical fallacies that can be found in Beitz´s theory, while the final part will analyse the real politics among an anarchical international system.

La Justicia Redistributiva Global y la Complejidad de las Estructuras Realistas