English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to assess individual differences in temperament and stress response and quantify their impact on feed efficiency, performance, and methane (CH 4 ) emissions in beef cattle. Eighty-four steers (castrated males) (Charolais or Luing) were used. Temperament was assessed using two standardized tests: restlessness when restrained [crush score (CS)] and flight speed (FS) on release from restraint. Over a 56-day period individual animal dry matter intake (DMI) and weekly body weight was measured. Ultrasound fat depth was measured at the end of 56 days. Average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and residual feed intake (RFI) were calculated. After the 56-day test period, animals were transported in groups of six/week to respiration chamber facilities. Blood samples were taken before and 0, 3, 6, and 9 h after transport. Plasma cortisol, creatine kinase (CK), glucose, and free fatty acids (FFA) were determined to assess physiological stress response. Subsequently, CH 4  emissions were measured over a 3-day period in individual respiration chambers. CS (1.7 ± 0.09) and FS (1.6 ± 0.60 m/s) were repeatable (0.63 and 0.51, respectively) and correlated ( r  = 0.36,  P  < 0.001). Plasma cortisol, CK, and FFA concentrations increased after transport ( P  = 0.038,  P  = 0.006, and  P  < 0.001, respectively). Temperament (CS) and CK concentration were correlated ( r  = 0.29;  P  = 0.015). The extreme group analysis reveals that excitable animals (FS;  P  = 0.032) and higher stress response (cortisol,  P  = 0.007; FFA,  P  = 0.007; and CK,  P  = 0.003) were associated with lower DMI. ADG was lower in more temperamental animals (CS,  P  = 0.097, and FS,  P  = 0.030). Fat depth was greater in steers showing calmer CS ( P  = 0.026) and lower plasma CK ( P  = 0.058). Temperament did not show any relationship with RFI or CH 4  emissions. However, steers with higher cortisol showed improved feed efficiency (lower FCR and RFI) ( P  < 0.05) and greater CH 4  emissions ( P  = 0.017). In conclusion, agitated temperament and higher stress responsiveness is detrimental to productivity. A greater stress response is associated with a reduction in feed intake that may both increase the efficiency of consumed feed and the ratio of CH 4  emissions/unit of feed. Therefore, temperament and stress response should be considered when designing strategies to improve efficiency and mitigate CH 4  emissions in beef cattle.

frontiers in veterinary science

Association of Temperament and Acute Stress Responsiveness with Productivity, Feed Efficiency, and Methane Emissions in Beef Cattle: An Observational Study