English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The influence of biological maturity status (BMS) on talent identification and development within elite youth soccer is critically debated. During adolescence, maturity-related performance differences within the same age group may cause greater chances of being selected for early maturing players. Therefore, coaches need to consider players' BMS. While standard methods for assessing BMS in adolescents are expensive and time-consuming imaging techniques (i.e., X-ray and MRI), there also exist more pragmatic procedures. This study aimed to evaluate commonly used methods to assess BMS within a highly selected sample of youth soccer players. A total of  N  = 63 elite male soccer players (U12 and U14) within the German Soccer Association's talent promotion program completed a test battery assessing BMS outcomes. Utilizing MRI diagnostics, players' skeletal age (SA MRI ) was determined by radiologists and served as the reference method. Further commonly used methods included skeletal age measured by an ultrasound device (SA US ), the maturity offset (MO MIR ), and the percentage of adult height (PAH KR ). The relation of these alternative BMS outcomes to SA MRI  was examined using different perspectives: performing bivariate correlation analyses (1), modeling BMS as a latent variable (BMS lat ) based on the multiple alternative diagnostics (2), and investigating individual differences in agreement (3). (1) Correlations of SA MRI  and the further BMS variables ranked from  r  = 0.80 to  r  = 0.84 for the total sample and were lower for U12 (0.56 ≤  r  ≤ 0.66), and U14 (0.61 ≤  r  ≤ 0.74) (2). The latent structural equation modeling (SEM) ( R  2  = 51%) revealed a significant influence on BMS lat  for MO MIR  (β = 0.51,  p  <0.05). The additional contribution of PAH KR  (β = 0.27,  p  = 0.06) and SA US  (β = −0.03,  p  = 0.90) was rather small (3). The investigation of individual differences between the reference method and alternative diagnostics indicated a significant bias for MO MIR  ( p  <0.01). The results support the use of economical and time-efficient methods for assessing BMS within elite youth soccer. Bivariate correlation analyses as well as the multivariate latent variable approach highlight the measures' usefulness. However, the observed individual level differences for some of the utilized procedures led to the recommendation for practitioners to use at least two alternative assessment methods in order to receive more reliable information about players' BMS within the talent promotion process.

Biological Maturity Status in Elite Youth Soccer Players: A Comparison of Pragmatic Diagnostics With Magnetic Resonance Imaging