English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective  To investigative the diagnostic performance of the morphological model, radiomics model, and combined model in differentiating invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs) from minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs).    Methods  This study retrospectively involved 307 patients who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) examination and presented as subsolid pulmonary nodules whose pathological findings were MIAs or IACs from January 2010 to May 2018. These patients were randomly assigned to training and validation groups in a ratio of 4:1 for 10 times. Eighteen categories of morphological features of pulmonary nodules including internal and surrounding structure were labeled. The following radiomics features are extracted: first-order features, shape-based features, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, gray-level size zone matrix (GLSZM) features, gray-level run length matrix (GLRLM) features, and gray-level dependence matrix (GLDM) features. The chi-square test and F1 test selected morphology features, and LASSO selected radiomics features. Logistic regression was used to establish models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the effectiveness, and Delong analysis compared ROC statistic difference among three models.    Results  In validation cohorts, areas under the curve (AUC) of the morphological model, radiomics model, and combined model of distinguishing MIAs from IACs were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.89; the sensitivity (SE) was 0.68, 0.81, and 0.83; and the specificity (SP) was 0.93, 0.79, and 0.87. There was no statistically significant difference in AUC between three models (p &amp;gt; 0.05).    Conclusion  The morphological model, radiomics model, and combined model all have a high efficiency in the differentiation between MIAs and IACs and have potential to provide non-invasive assistant information for clinical decision-making.

frontiers in oncology

Comparison of Comprehensive Morphological and Radiomics Features of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules to Distinguish Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinomas and Invasive Adenocarcinomas in CT Scan